Posts Tagged ‘collection’

Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion…What’s the Difference?

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

Depending on who you ask, some people may say that tax avoidance is either “smart business” or it’s “immoral”. But, if done correctly, there’s one thing it’s not…It’s not illegal. There are numerous ways that a person can decrease his or her tax liability legally: 1. Claiming deductions 2. Incorporating. 3. Setting up a charitable trust or foundation.

 More complicated and controversial methods include setting up an offshore company, trust or foundation in an offshore jurisdiction. Tax evasion, on the other hand, is the willful act of misrepresenting financial information to avoid the tax liability. Common forms of tax evasion are understating income, wages or gains on the sale of property and/or overstating tax deductions.

 What’s the Difference? To keep it simple – think of it this way: Tax avoidance is the maneuvering to avoid the tax liability in the first place. The tax does not exist, because in a legal sense, no income, profit or gain ever existed. Tax evasion is maneuvering to avoid the payment of a tax liability that has already been created. The tax exists because the income, profit or gain already exists. To avoid paying the tax is a criminal act.

 Why Would the Government Allow Tax Avoidance? Obviously, no government could function if all its citizens legally avoided paying taxes. While there are legal means of tax avoidance that every citizen has a right to put into practice, there are also “abusive tax avoidance strategies” that the IRS warns against openly. These include: a. Anti-Tax Law Schemes b. Abusive Home-Based Business Schemes c. Abusive Trust Schemes d. Misuse of the Disabled Access Credit e. Abusive Offshore Schemes f. Employee Plans Abusive Tax Transactions g. Exempt Organization Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions.

 The IRS tows a hard line with the promotion of Illegal Tax Schemes posing as Legal Tax Avoidance Strategies.

Tax Avoidance has always had its share of hucksters and scam artists who appeal to the “greed mechanism” present in some taxpayers, by selling “get out of paying tax legally” kits and seminars.

 If Your Name is On a List of a Tax Shelter Promoter—The IRS is Watching You. In a recent effort to cut down on abusive tax avoidance scheme, the Department of Justice is now requiring promoters of tax shelters to make their list of clients available to the IRS. If called upon, these promoters must give names as well as details of the transactions. For abusive tax schemes, this provision has proven to be an effective means for the IRS catching not only the promoter…but also the clients.

 Do What’s Right…But Get Legal Help If You’re Unsure. If you’ve participated in a tax avoidance strategy and you find yourself questioning if it was legal, don’t wait to find out “the hard way”.  Remember, even if you’ve been involved in an illegal tax avoidance scheme, you can still make restitution for your actions without it ending up in a jail sentence. But there’s no question that you’ll need competent legal help in this situation.

Can the IRS take your Social Security?

Friday, November 18th, 2011

YES.  The IRS can take your Social Security to satisfy a tax debt.

In fact , in July 2000, not only did the new Federal Payment Levy Program allow the IRS to dip into some Social Benefits paid to you, but it can also take money that you’ve received from:

-Federal employee retirement annuities

-Federal payments made to you as a contractor/vendor doing business with the government (including DEfense contracts)

-Federal employee travel advances or reimbursements

-And some federal salaries

IRS No Longer Limits the Innocence of a Spouse

Friday, November 4th, 2011

The IRS is making some common sense reforms to some of its arbitrary rules by instituting new guidelines in connection with “innocent spouse relief requests”.

 An innocent spouse is classified as a person that had no knowledge that his or her spouse was defrauding the IRS by underpaying their taxes.

 Until this change in regulation, there was a two year limit that was applied to any innocent spouse attempting to file a relief request. The change applies to all future requests and will retroactively be applied to previously denied claims.

 The IRS change only applies to the equitable relief provision. This provision absolves the innocent spouse of any liability in paying past due taxes and relieves them of any interest or penalties associated with the unpaid taxes. Innocent spouses must prove that at the time of signing the joint tax return, they had no knowledge of any wrongdoing on behalf of the guilty spouse.

 If a request is approved, the IRS allows the innocent spouse to pay the taxes that they are responsible for, but relieves them of any penalties and fines associated with the misfiling of the taxes.

 The intent of the law was that an innocent spouse would have two years to file a request for relief. However, this law did not take into account spouses that were victims of domestic violence and abuse.

 Many members of congress have been lobbying for a change in the regulation for some time now. The IRS receives 50,000 requests annually for innocent spouse relief. Of those 50,000, 4%, or 2,000, requests are rejected because they are outside the 2 year limit.

 This change in policy will now help 2,000 innocent spouses avoid the penalties and fines for something that they were never aware was happening.

 All future requests will be processed without looking at a term limit. However, if you have had a previous request denied due to the 2 year limit, you must file an IRS Form 8857 “Request for innocent spouse relief”. The IRS will not apply the two year limit in any active litigation.

Is it possible to pay the IRS “pennies on the dollar” and have the rest of your tax bill forgiven?

Thursday, October 27th, 2011

Yes-it is possible…..but it’s not very likely. 

It’s called an Offer-In-Compromise- and it used to be the only legitimate way to negotiate an actual lowering of the amount of taxes owed to the IRS by a taxpayer…sometimes far less.

However, since the IRS has seen so much “abuse” of this particular method of tax relief in recent years, they have shown by their actions that they are less and less apt to accept an Offer-In-Compromise.

Illinois Man Sentenced for Income Tax Evasion

Monday, July 25th, 2011

On September, 30, 2010 in Fairview Heights, Ill., Orvil Hassebrock was sentenced to 36 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release and ordered to pay restitution and fines of more than $1.71 million for failing to file tax returns.  According to court documents, Hassebrock was convicted on April 29, 2010, for willfully attempting to evade and defeat the assessment and payment of income tax for 2004 and willful failure to file an income tax return resulting in a tax loss to the IRS of nearly $594,000.  Hassebrock’s restitution includes back taxes, interest, fines and a special assessment.

Capitol Hill Employees Owe $9.3 Million Worth of Overdue Taxes

Sunday, November 14th, 2010

The Internal Revenue Service recently released information that government employees on Capitol Hill owe overdue taxes worth $9.3 million, as part of the per agency IRS debt breakdown.  It is not clear whether there are some Congress members guilty of not properly paying their taxes, as the agency refused to specify those involved.

638 people, or around four percent of the 18,000 Capitol Hill employees, are included.  There is an average of $12,787 and $15,478 worth of unpaid taxes by offending taxpayers from the Senate and the Congress employees, respectively.

According to the Taxpayers for Common Sense Vice President Steve Ellis, the people of the Congress, including the staff members, have higher responsibility  in this matter because they write the laws and they are in public positions. Because of this, Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah filed legislation to release from service the people who are holding government office or jobs but also have tax issues. It has been co-sponsored by eight Republicans, although no Democrats signed on the bill,  saying that it would lessen the view of the government paying its employees.

Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, who has authority over tax matters, said that it is indeed embarrassing for people in such positions to not follow the tax laws they themselves made.  Proper payment of tax is essential to promoting Democracy, so there is no excuse even though we are facing tough times, according to Mortimer Caplin, former IRS commissioner.

It has been noted that IRS debts have been increasing nationwide, which started even before the economic problems. At the end of 2009 alone, $103.2 billion worth of taxes have gone unpaid.  According to experts, this delinquency shows that the economic pressures are taking its toll on American families.

The fluctuating nature of workforce during change of dominance in political party may also be one of the reasons why there is an increase in overdue taxes.

Jock Friedly, who broadcasts the congressional wages on LegiStorm, may have an explanation.  Most of the new staff originally came from private companies where their earnings were much higher.  The reduction in their earnings has much impact on them, making debts pile up in the long run.

Can You Really Pay the IRS Pennies on the Dollar?

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

Is it really possible to pay the IRS “pennies on the dollar” and have the rest of your tax bill forgiven?  Yes – it is possible…but it’s not very likely.  It’s called an Offer-In-Compromise – and it used to be the only legitimate way to negotiate an actual lowering of the amount of taxes owed to the IRS by a taxpayer…sometimes far less.

However, since the IRS has seen so much “abuse” of this particular method of tax relief in recent years, they have shown by their actions that they are less and less apt to accept an Offer-In-Compromise.

In a press release dated October 2004, the IRS stated “This program serves an important purpose. But we do warn taxpayers to watch out for unscrupulous promoters charging excessive fees to taxpayers who have no chance of meeting the program’s requirements,” said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. “Taxpayers should not be duped by high-priced promises.” In fact, as of 2006, the IRS now rejects 85% of all Offers-in-Compromise.

Although an Offer-In-Compromise is one option for paying off IRS debt, it may not be the right option for you.  There’s no sense in pursuing this payment option with 15% success rate if there’s little hope that it will be accepted.

In fact, if you choose to hire a lawyer to represent you before the IRS, it’s critical that he/she is looking out for you and only wants the best outcome for your case.   Since the IRS only accepts 15% of Offers-In-Compromise, any good lawyer representing you must have full knowledge of all other options available through the IRS.  Plus, they would need to be able to thoroughly examine your case before they ever made a suggestion of the best action to take.

There’s also a new plan available: the new Partial Payment Installment Agreement (PPIA) enacted in January of 2005 is a form of payment that may allow you to pay off your taxes and have part of the debt forgiven.  With this new method, the IRS considers how much you owe before the 10-year statute of limitations runs out.

Legally, a tax professional can represent you to the IRS even if they live thousands of miles away from you.  But is that what you want when you’re dealing with something as stressful as IRS problems?

Or would you rather have someone who you can speak with face-to-face…who lives in your city…who has a reputation to uphold in your community?

Can the IRS Really Shut Down a Business?

Monday, June 7th, 2010

In short…you betcha. Let’s take a look at a real-life example:

According to IRS records, an auction was held at Mangia Bev Italian Restaurant on 7/18/07, where “the property described below has been seized for nonpayment of internal revenue taxes due from Taxpayer”:

“Contents of restaurant, including but not limited to: refrigerators, freezers, fryer, ovens, tables, chairs, patio furniture, patio umbrellas, patio heater, water fountain, metal racks, fryer, warmer, stainless steel sinks, Panasonic televisions, folding tables, skillets, bowls, glassware, plates, flatware, microwave, pictures, prep stations, tools, Radiant Systems Point of Sale computer equipment and much, much more.”

I don’t know who the owners of the Mangia Bev Italian Restaurant were.

If they were anything like independent restaurant owners I’ve known in the past, I’m sure when they started they had high hopes for the future.

They may have dreamed of opening multiple locations and eventually reaping the benefits of being successful business owners in the United States.

Restaurant work is hard work with long hours, late nights and virtually no weekends off.  Most restaurant owners I’ve known are “jacks of all trades” who will do every job in the place, including washing the dishes if the dishwasher doesn’t show up.

After all that hard work, imagine what it would be like to sit and watch the IRS come in shut down your restaurant.

I wonder what happened along the way that lead to this?  Restaurant mismanagement?  Perhaps a divorce?  Sickness in the family?  Who knows?

Either way, eventually something happened that made it difficult for them to pay their bills.

Maybe they started having to juggle payments to food vendors and the owners may have even stopped taking a paycheck.

But, if they ever made the fatal mistake of non filing payroll taxes…it may have led to a very quick and decisive response from the IRS.

When it comes to payroll taxes, the IRS doesn’t mess around.

Regarding unpaid payroll taxes, the IRS makes it very clear:

“Caution:  Once we assert the penalty, we can take collection action against your personal assets. For instance, we can file a federal tax lien or take levy or seizure action..”

What If You Simply Cannot Afford To Pay The IRS?

Saturday, May 22nd, 2010

Even the IRS knows that you cannot pay taxes with money you don’t have.  You may qualify for “Non-Collectible” Status.

In fact, if you are deemed to be ‘Non-Collectible”, the IRS must immediately STOP taking your wages and get their paws out of your bank account.  All garnishments and levies must cease.

But understand…if you qualify for this “deal”…the IRS will eventually want their money.  They may give you 18 months to over 2 years to “catch up” on your finances – however, when you do, they will come looking for what they’re owed.

Plus, you will accrue interest during this time, so you end up owing more than you did originally. In fact, you must pay these future taxes in full, and on time, or you’ll blow it big time. If you neglect to pay your taxes for future years, or worse – you don’t file…the whole CNC deal is off.

If this happens, the IRS will come after all of the money you owe them, and they may use garnishments, levies, seizures, liens, and all of the “nasty” tactics at their disposal to get their money.

Still, upon hearing this, you may think this sounds like a “great deal” … but be warned: do NOT make the mistake of calling the IRS yourself, to see if you can qualify for non-collectible status.

Here’s why – the reasons that you give as to why you can’t pay them will NOT necessarily “line up” with their “definition” of not being able to pay. And if you make the mistake of letting  your financial “cat out of bag” to them – they will decide what you can and cannot pay.

You see, what you list to the IRS as being “ordinary and necessary living expenses” – causing you not to be able to pay…may not jive with what the IRS considers “ordinary and necessary”.

You could find yourself thinking that you were $100 “in the hole” every month – and by the time the IRS gets done looking at things from their perspective…they may determine that you can actually pay them $500 a month.

Now you’re on the hook for a monthly payment that you can’t afford…but the IRS “thinks” that you can pay it.  Not a good situation to be in.

This can happen if you don’t know what the IRS’ definition of “ordinary and necessary” is before you approach them. Don’t make this mistake.

IRS “Men in Black” Demand 4-Cent Delinquent Payment From Sacramento Car Wash

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Aaron Zeff, owner of Harv’s Metro Car Wash in Sacramento, recently had the scary experience of being visited by two dark-suited IRS agents.

According to Mr. Zeff, the agents demanded payment of delinquent taxes in a “very serious, very aggressive, very condescending” manner.

His crime? According to the agents, the grand total of delinquent taxes due:

4 cents.

That’s right—not enough to buy a candy bar or a piece of gum.

Perhaps mailing the bill would have been a better idea?  At least a postage stamp would have only put the taxpayers forty cents or so in the red.

Instead, it cost taxpayers exponentially more than 4 cents to pay the gas for the trip over there—not to mention the salaries of the two agents.

Mr. Zeff took it all in stride, finding the entire situation laughable…that is, until he read the demand letter, informing him the interest and penalties on the unpaid debt had accrued to a whopping $202.81.

Allegedly, since the offending omission occurred in 2006, he apparently owed 5070 times four cents!

In his defense, Mr. Zeff produced a letter dated from October 2009 from the IRS which asserted that Harv’s Metro Car Wash “”has filed all required returns and addressed any balances due.”

In fact, prior to the incident in question, Mr. Zeff said no other notice of demand for payment was made by the government.

An IRS representative, when asked by local reporters, declined to comment, citing privacy and disclosure laws.

Mr. Zeff complained to reporters that the agents were not only rude, “they didn’t even get a car wash”.